Unruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agoThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1204arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
arrow-up1195arrow-down1imageThe New York Times ever being perceived as progressive is the biggest scam ever.lemmy.worldUnruffled [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Fediverse vs Disinformation@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: antiwork@lemmy.world
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·9 hours agoYou are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·7 hours agoOk, but isn’t the OP about the NYT?
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·6 hours agoThe root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety: opinion columnist It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 hours agoSure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·5 hours agoNo, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?
You are confused: it’s an editorial from the Washington Post.
Ok, but isn’t the OP about the NYT?
The root comment of this chain, to which you responded to, is, in it’s entirety:
It does not specify a paper. Nor is the practice of employing columnists for opinion laundering limited to the NYT.
Sure, but the context of the post is NYT. Feel free to start your own thread about the WP I guess?
No, the context is opinion columns. Or are you making the claim that NYT, specifically, does not engage in the practice, unlike WaPo?