• Nevoic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    MLK said it best, so I’ll just quote him directly:

    I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.”

    When moderates advocate for “kindness” or “civility”, they’re advocating for negative peace; the absence of tension. Vegans advocate for positive peace; the presence of justice. When activists advocate for positive peace, in the face of those who deny said justice, tensions rise and moderates fall back to this common trope.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      Holy shit you did not just quote MLK at me saying people who eat cheese should not be harrassed!

      That is a disturbing twisting of both veganism and MLK. :(

      Once again I participate with so many vegan individuals in ways that do not involve harrassment campaigns. Here is a list of direct action that I consider constructive:

      • animal rescue
      • investigations of animal abuse
      • leafleting
      • inline education campaigns
      • protests and marches
      • restaurant sit-ins
      • graffiti
      • civil disobedience
      • many more

      Again I cannot believe I am saying this, but there is no credible evidence that MLK participated in harrassment against individuals admitting minor disagreement. Attacking a person who admits to eating cheese, like maybe 60% of the world population, accusing them of being a rapist constantly and repeatedly, and calling that “advocacy for positive peace,” is really really fucking sad. It is absolutely terrifyingly in bad faith to quote MLK in defense of such behavior.

      disclaimer

      Maybe this isn’t you, I haven’t checked your account history so keep that in mind. You have my apologies if you aren’t doing verbal abuse. :)

      My criticisms of others in the Lemmy community who do verbal attacks do hold, though. I am just glad they are the minority in real life and only seem to exist online.

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Why should people committing unjust acts be allowed to commit them in peace? Where is the peace for their victims if we do not speak up? The MLK quote seems entirely fitting.