Summary

Donald Trump and Republicans are falsely framing his 2024 election win as a historic “landslide” and sweeping mandate, despite the data showing otherwise.

Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968, and his 307 electoral votes rank low in U.S. history.

Crucial Senate and House gains were limited, with Republicans relying on gerrymandering for their narrow House majority.

This exaggeration of victory serves to justify potential power expansions, but the facts debunk claims of an unprecedented or overwhelming mandate.

  • unmagical@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    They already have power. They don’t need a justification for expansion they’ll just do it.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      Yes and no. All power, ultimately, depends on compliance. Even autocracies. There would not have been a “divine right of kings” if kings did not have a pressing need to assure people of their right to hold power.

      The “mandate” narrative is aimed at convincing everyone that their objections are in the minority. That even if they stand up and say something, they’ll simply be the odd one out.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Power ultimately depends on violence. Violence can create compliance and vice versa, but the violence and compliance with violence is what’s fundamental. These politicians are very capable of overwhelming violence. It’s a crucial part of their function. It’s been the norm as long as states have existed.

        There wouldn’t have been the “divine right of kings” if kings were unable to torture and murder people.

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          20 days ago

          The state’s ability to use violence is entirely contingent on compliance.

          There are approximately 1.3 million police officers in the US. That number doubles if you were to throw in the entire US military. That is about 1% of the adult population of the US (~260 million).

          The only reason state violence is possible is because people accept it. If every time a police officer tried to arrest someone, an entire neighbourhood rolled out to stop them, no amount of military grade weaponry would prevent a total breakdown of government control. This is what is meant by “policing by consent”. It is the understanding that policing only works because people consent to be policed.

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            20 days ago

            One could reasonably interpret the entirety of the modern era to be the upper class’s quest to push us as close to that point as possible without quite getting there. They’ve already pushed it pretty god damn far with very little meaningful resistance. If the public’s line in the sand is on the far side of fascism then that line may as well not exist at all.