VITecNet@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agoFound in the wild: The world’s first unkillable UEFI bootkit for Linuxarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up166arrow-down19cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.selinux@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up157arrow-down1external-linkFound in the wild: The world’s first unkillable UEFI bootkit for Linuxarstechnica.comVITecNet@programming.dev to Linux@lemmy.ml · 14 hours agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.selinux@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.worldpulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squaremetaStatic@kbin.earthlinkfedilinkarrow-up73arrow-down1·13 hours ago found in the wild no evidence of actual infections in the wild you know I shouldn’t be disappointed by blatant lies in headlines with the state of journalism in current year but I still kinda am.
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 hours agoI’m disappointed, but this is a good thing.
minus-squareMTK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 hours agoYou can find it in the wild without finding evidence of infection. I think in this context found in the wild means that the sample was found in the wild, just maybe not running.
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 hours agoYou are disappointed because it doesn’t have to be this way.
you know I shouldn’t be disappointed by blatant lies in headlines with the state of journalism in current year but I still kinda am.
I’m disappointed, but this is a good thing.
Thanks for saving my time.
You can find it in the wild without finding evidence of infection.
I think in this context found in the wild means that the sample was found in the wild, just maybe not running.
You are disappointed because it doesn’t have to be this way.