• vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Varied by country, the Jewish Oblast was kinda shit, but the land in Alaska had potential for example. The Alaska thing wasnt official just an idea a lot of folks were lightly okay with.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      A Jewish reservation. In Alaska.

      Bro…

      Know any other groups of people who might need reservations in Alaska? Know any of them who actually have their rights respected?

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There was also ones proposed in Uganda, southern Argentina, Madagascar, and Tasmania. Though I will note that last one is a bit scarce and I only know of it due to an obscure book from the 1890s.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          The Madagascar plan was the Nazis and explicitly designed to starve them all to death. I assume the Tasmanian idea is similar in goal. “Hey, this area will technically fit them all, we don’t need to check how much of the land is arable ;)”

          I don’t think you could create a sovereign space for a couple million refugees in either Uganda Argentina but feel free to correct me.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            I think the Tasmania thing was a throw shit at the wall thing. But you could definitely keep a strong population in southern Argentina, that part of Patagonia is pretty fertile.