Why such a way outdated source?
Natürlich ist der relevanteste Aspekt dieser Frage, insbesondere in Anbetracht unseres derzeitigen politischen Klimas, gekonnt außen vor gelassen worden…
Also die Rassisitisch/Populistische Überfremdungs-Theorie hier reinzubringen ist schon etwas platt (so verstehe ich zumindest deinen Kommentar).
Mein Kommentar oben zeigt dir ganz leicht, dass die anzahl der Muslimen bei Maximal 6% liegen kann , die Konfessionslosen jedoch bei 44% stehen.
Momentan verlieren die “Christliche Kirchen” mehr als eine Million Mitglieder (Gläubige kann man die sicher nicht mehr nennen) durch Tod und Austritte pro Jahr, das bedeutet, dass wir spätestens in fünf Jahren eine Mehrheit von Konfessionslosen in der Bevölkerung haben.
Zuwanderung hat damit nichts zu tun, sondern nur das massive moralische Versagen der selbst ernannten Moralapostel.
Zusätzlich muss man die Daten noch etwas relativieren: Es gibt diverse Branchen, in denen man ohne Kirchenzugehörigkeit kaum Arbeit findet (Der gesamte Pflegesektor von Kindern über Kranke bis zu Senioren). Wenn tatsächlich nur die Gläubigen gezählt werden würden, hätten wir bestimmt maximal die Hälfte der Mitglieder. Und ohne eine Zwangsindoktrinierung über das Schulsystem wären die Kirchen in Deutschland in ca 40 Jahren am Ende (siehe DDR).
Warum das gleiche nochmal?
Wegen der Quellenangabe
Im glad atheist numbers are growing. All religions are cancers. I dont care what you believe, but keep it to yourself.
You do realize that the “non religious” does not mean atheist, but also includes agnostics?
Also if you look at the map you can see that the non religiousness is primarily caused by the socialist government in former east Germany not being too kind of any religion. You can even see the divide in East and West-Berlin. At the same time there is many people that are registered as protestants or catholics even though they don’t feel religious. This map does not help to see such a development.
If we’re going into details, then most agnostics are part of the atheist-umbrella.
Gnosticism refers to knowledge, Theism refers to belief.
Someone who says “it’s unknowable if god exists” and doesn’t actively belief (or withholds judgement) in a god is an agnostic atheist. Someone who says it’s unknowable but beliefs anyway is an agnostic theist.
Most people who identify as agnostics are agnostic atheists, they do not actively belief in a god.
If you want to separate agnostics and atheists, then you reduce atheism to a small subset of gnostic atheism (it can be known if god exists and doesn’t belief that god exists)
Agnostics generally don’t want to force their beliefs on others though. They won’t go against established science to oppose abortion, they won’t advocate for laws against blasphemy, they won’t usually oppose the rights of non traditional families. So agnostic is already a big win in my book.
Most moderate christians in Germany dont do any of these either.
Heck we had a catholic priest sue against the fascist party AfD for some of their posters being hate speech against trans people and drag artists. Article in German:
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/muenchen-drag-lesung-strafanzeige-afd-1.5921390?reduced=true
Crazy, how such a small time when germany was divided had such a large effect. The Soviets knew how to shape a people, I give them that.
I would see it the other way around. It shows that religion is nothing natural and as soon as churches aren’t actively allowed to indoctrinate children for one generation religious influence is massively reduced.
other religions would be interesting aswell since those 2 are definitly not the only religions there.
Only 7 years out of date, nice
It just took so long for the internet in Germany to load
That’s not exactly right. Multiple public authorities had to check if that’s right and if the publisher is allowed to publish this. This alone took 6 years.
