• breakingcups@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    I also wish they’d worded it in a way where it’d be illegal for women to marry children too, just to cover all bases.

    • nfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t find the text of the new law in 5 minutes of searching, but from looking at a variety of reports, it seems like this law removes loopholes that were being used to get parental permission for marriages involving children. I suspect they just wrote it this way because the bulk of the issue is older men marrying teenage girls, and that is a thing it does ban.

    • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t actually know but it is fairly likely that the definition of ‘man’ in the law is defined as any person. It is that way in the US at least, though most new laws and such use person there are quite a few old laws that use such wording to describe any person.