• fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Regarding your Robert Engel from previously, there’s a whole load of artists historically, who have virtually no information about them. If they weren’t famous whilst alive, who would bother to write down a biography at the time? Afterwards, you’re left with researching records from census, school, sales, newspapers, possible living relatives etc.

      A lot of museums and galleries with permanent collections have 3 to 50 times as much stuff in stores as is on display. You’re not allowed to get rid of anything, but any year, you might receive another truck-load of badly labelled and badly maintained artworks from some rich bloke’s private collection, or someone’s tax write-off. You’d have to choose which ones get processed or researched first (after the existing backlog). Sometimes the information just isn’t there though - that’s why you get all those works that just get labelled “Unknown Man with a blue hat, likely Dutch School, circa 1650s”.

      I think the information and documentation of such things is actually getting better, compared to pre-internet, certainly - but yeah, some people will have no information, and some will have information, but it’s still in a paper folder, waiting for someone to type it up :)

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        there’s a whole load of artists historically, who have virtually no information about them. If they weren’t famous whilst alive, who would bother to write down a biography at the time? Afterwards, you’re left with researching records from census, school, sales, newspapers, possible living relatives etc.

        That makes sense. Today I learned. Thanks!

    • nyctre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      A word for word translation of the french title would be “the beautiful chocolate maker/seller”. Not calling her a chocolate. (Also, I’m assuming that’s hot chocolate that she’s carrying)

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Cannibal. To be a vampire requires her to be a mutated/magical type of chocolate, doesn’t it? There’s more to being a vampire than drinking blood.