hypertown@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoA meme for math peoplelemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: mathematikmathematik@feddit.de
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageA meme for math peoplelemmy.worldhypertown@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square13fedilinkcross-posted to: mathematikmathematik@feddit.de
minus-squareThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoI know I’m bad at math but I don’t understand how 2x0=0 but 2^0=1 How are they different answers when they’re both essentially multiplying 2 by zero? Someone with a bigger brain please explain this Edit: I greatly appreciate all the explanations but all they’ve done is solidify the fact that I’ll never be good at math 😭
minus-squarejendrik@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agosubtracting one from Exponent means halving (when the base is two): 2⁴ = 16 2³ = 8 2² = 4 2¹ = 2 2⁰ = 1 It’s a simple continuation of the pattern and required for mathemarical rules to work.
minus-squareuberrice@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoThis is confidently wrong. 3^0 is also 1. 2738394728^0 is also 1. Edit: just saw that technically you’re correct - sure. IF base 2, Exponent reduction equals to halving - dividing by 2. For x^y reducing y by one is equal to dividing by x, then we have the proof it always works.
minus-squareGlobulart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoThis isn’t strictly speaking a proof, but it did help me to accept it as it demonstrates the function that makes it 1. 2^3 = 2x2x2 2^2 = 2x2 (23)/(22) = (2x2x2)/(2x2) = 2 = 2^(3-2) In general terms: (xa)/(xb) = x^(a-b) If a and b are the same number this is x^0 and obviously (xa)/(xa) is one because anything divided by itself is 1. Hope that helps
minus-squarehemmes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoYes, of course, obviously…JFC, what??
minus-squareFlumsy@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoThat was pretty complicated, here is a simpler answer I hsve come up with: 1=(2x2x2)/(2x2x2)=2³/2³=2³⁻³=2⁰ If that makes sense to you…
minus-squareiamkindasomeone@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIts not the same. And theres proof, why.
I know I’m bad at math but I don’t understand how 2x0=0 but 2^0=1
How are they different answers when they’re both essentially multiplying 2 by zero?
Someone with a bigger brain please explain this
Edit: I greatly appreciate all the explanations but all they’ve done is solidify the fact that I’ll never be good at math 😭
subtracting one from Exponent means halving (when the base is two):
2⁴ = 16 2³ = 8 2² = 4 2¹ = 2 2⁰ = 1
It’s a simple continuation of the pattern and required for mathemarical rules to work.
This is confidently wrong.
3^0 is also 1. 2738394728^0 is also 1.
Edit: just saw that technically you’re correct - sure.
IF base 2, Exponent reduction equals to halving - dividing by 2.
For x^y reducing y by one is equal to dividing by x, then we have the proof it always works.
This isn’t strictly speaking a proof, but it did help me to accept it as it demonstrates the function that makes it 1.
2^3 = 2x2x2
2^2 = 2x2
(23)/(22) = (2x2x2)/(2x2) = 2
= 2^(3-2)
In general terms:
(xa)/(xb) = x^(a-b)
If a and b are the same number this is x^0 and obviously (xa)/(xa) is one because anything divided by itself is 1.
Hope that helps
Yes, of course, obviously…JFC, what??
That was pretty complicated, here is a simpler answer I hsve come up with:
1=(2x2x2)/(2x2x2)=2³/2³=2³⁻³=2⁰
If that makes sense to you…
Its not the same. And theres proof, why.