no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 hours agoToday has been a learning experience.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1289arrow-down123
arrow-up1266arrow-down1imageToday has been a learning experience.lemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 hours agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squaremagic_lobster_party@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up14·12 hours agoI don’t trust you. There must be some hidden meaning.
minus-squareBuddahriffic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·10 hours agoI don’t trust them either. But I can’t not trust them unless I trust you, which I don’t. This feels like a variation of that two guard riddle except the warning is “both guards lie all of the time” and the two guards still don’t agree. Which is resolved by the riddle itself being the lie. Applying that here means we should do the opposite and not (never trust anyone). Now which way does that not apply? sometimes trust anyone never distrust anyone never trust noone sometimes distrust anyone never distrust noone sometimes trust noone sometimes distrust noone
I don’t trust you. There must be some hidden meaning.
I don’t trust them either. But I can’t not trust them unless I trust you, which I don’t.
This feels like a variation of that two guard riddle except the warning is “both guards lie all of the time” and the two guards still don’t agree.
Which is resolved by the riddle itself being the lie. Applying that here means we should do the opposite and not (never trust anyone).
Now which way does that not apply?