Actually we called them Mitläufer (going along with the dominant party in fear of punishment)… but they sure weren’t any better than Nazis.
I dont really fault someone for joining a party bcz they don’t want to be shot and drug through the dirt.
I’ve never seen or heard anyone use drug as the past tense of drag in my long-legged life.
Actually you have, right before you wrote that comment.
Drig, Drag, Drug
I guess it’s an irregular use of the word. Maybe where I grew up, or I’m tired today. Dunno.
It’s cromulent, don’t worry about it.
Oh boy here we go again
They are at fault. If everyone that didn’t refuse join because of such reasons didn’t join there would be no one to do the shotting and the dragging.
Boy wait until you hear about forced religious conversions.
Assuming everyone coordinates and works together to fight it. It’s much easier to kill someone who refuses to join than it is to protect them.
Well sure, it really only takes about 30% of a population to subjugation, and another 30% to not give a crap. But that’s not what we’re talking about here. Besides, easy to sit on a phone and be brave and say you’d stand up to an oppressive regime. Harder to do when someone actually points a gun at you.
What if your culture was the inspiration for the nazis?
History furnishes us with innumerable instances that prove this law. It shows, with a startling clarity, that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood with that of an inferior race the result has been the downfall of the people who were the standard-bearers of a higher culture. In North America, where the population is prevalently Teutonic, and where those elements intermingled with the inferior race only to a very small degree, we have a quality of mankind and a civilization which are different from those of Central and South America. In these latter countries the immigrants–who mainly belonged to the Latin races–mated with the aborigines, sometimes to a very large extent indeed. In this case we have a clear and decisive example of the effect produced by the mixture of races. But in North America the Teutonic element, which has kept its racial stock pure and did not mix it with any other racial stock, has come to dominate the American Continent and will remain master of it as long as that element does not fall a victim to the habit of adulterating its blood.
https://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks02/0200601.txt - Main Kampf
Jim Crow was Hitler’s inspiration tor the Nuremberg laws.
Black GIs then came back from liberating Europe.
To by lynched from trees for being ‘Uppity’.
This is the heritage they are proud of:
Sounds like a bunch of shitty historians.
Of course the motives matter, most of all for a good historian. Those who wish to reconstruct the past shall not be deterred from their goal just because “nobody cares anymore”. Fidelity to an accurate representation of the past is the only acceptable rendition of history, otherwise why even bother.
The history of Western Europe, the Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa, and the Americas is littered with “reformed Nazis” who came out of the 2nd World War pledging themselves to the cause of US/UK Capitalist Imperialism. It is not merely that we disregarded the intentions of the Reluctant Wehrmacht. It is that we found many of these fascists to be useful - either as expendable shock troops during the Cold War or as spies, scientists, and bureaucrats in postwar states still invested in a politically correct form of apartheid.
You can find the breadcrumb trail of German Fascism leading out of Berlin and into Buenos Aeries, Cape Town, and Huntsville Alabama. These fuckers never actually went away.
Don’t forget about the regular capitalists. Many of the richest German industrialists today are direct heirs of Nazis who actively helped Hitler gain power, built a personal empire from slave labor, faced no consequences for their actions, and were allowed to keep operating after the war.
They never went away because their ideals were not defeated. They went away into a USA that segregated blacks from whites and had Japanese internment camps. You blame Nazis as the source, but they are merely a symptom of a human condition. And as long as we don’t collectively uplift ourselves, it’s never going to be overcome, no matter how many proponents are killed off or muffled in the background.
Ok so what would you call them?
Well, I’d like to call them people. Wanna know why? I’ll tell you even if you don’t. It’s because despite our choices in life, we are all people. We can hate each other, renounce our humanity or run away from the truth with a myriad of excuses, but at the heart of the matter we are all people.
As long as you never let go of that concept, you will understand that those that do let go become capable of incredible harm to one another. And when that happens, the main point to be wary of isn’t when they will do incredible harm, but whether to join them in letting go as well. Because once you join them in this, you too will be capable of causing incredible harm.
Is that train of thought wrong? Or is killing each other the only real answer?
“I’m socially liberal but financially
naziconservative”Me, among others.
Removed by mod
Tankies voting 3rd party in a fptp electoral system. When ignorance and russian propaganda meet.
I’m sure your point will be heard, though!
narrator: “it wasn’t”
Most moderate .ml user
Removed by mod
Russia doesn’t need bots when they have so many “useful idiot” edge lords to create their strawman for them.
Removed by mod
Ah yes removing nuance, always a win.
This list is conveniently leaving out the motive of ‘being threatened’, because motives do sometimes matter.
The proper term is “nazi-collaborateur”.
And no I am of course not condoning any violence.
I am pretty sure if you join the Nazi party, you are a Nazi.
A Nazi collaborator would be… a non Nazi, who worked with Nazis.
Some collaborators had the choice to either join the party later on or openly oppose them. In germany people who joined the party after the war started are often viewed different from those who followed early on.
Just today i heared a podcast about Werner Foßmann and the fact that he joined the party in the early 30s was a point against him.
Good point
Fuck off, nazi
Thank you for your nuanced reply and your openness for semantics discussion.
Provocative question: Do you think then that the US should’ve strangled half the German population instead of just a dozen at the Nuremberg Trials because a Nazi is a Nazi?
No, we strangled the ones in charge and then forced the remainder to literally pay while their country was occupied. A culture of anti-nazism was forced upon the Germans with law.
Growth is important for everyone. MAGA can still bend the knee and atone for their bigotry.
No you did not follow the Morgentau Plan. Instead you gave Germany a bunch of money to rebuild under the Marshall Plan, and treated us quite kindly to lead us on the right path. (In contrast to the USSR which took revenge by letting their soldiers rape and loot, and disassembled German industries as repayment. The Soviets also tried to forcibly “denazify” Germany which was unsucsessful.)
No, we strangled the ones in charge and then […]
So we agree that there is a difference between Nazis of different caliber, and they’re to be treated differently.
Yeah, the whole crux of my statement was we offed the ones in charge and helped the other ones realize the ghastly error of their ways. By force if necessary, but money tends to work too.
Unless you’re saying we shouldn’t have fought against Nazis?
Genuinely confused how people can be defending Nazis in 2024 but… here we are I guess.
I’m not defending Nazis? I just disagree with the post, which I understood calls for people to dismiss nuance and engage a black and white view. Which smells like populism to me
they’re to be treated differently.
What you’re conflating is being prosecuted for your war crimes. Holy bad faith.
Why did the debatelolds decide they were welcome here, instead of samethingawful 15 years ago where they belong?
Shut the fuck up Nazi.
The quote clearly states ‘joined the party’, those are NOT collaborateurs, those are members of the Nazi party, or as explained - Nazis.
Nobody was threatened to join the party, historians agree on that, people who joined were either true believers or did so to gain some sort of advantage.
The NSDAP, at their peak had 8.5 million members (1945), so around 20-25% of the German population at the time. We can argue about the other 80%, there is some nuance to be found there, of course. But those 20% Nazi Party members were Nazis, no nuance needed.
Ok I can agree with that
Your comment is very nuanced btw
You mean this nuance?
Just like in Snake Berlin!
I can’t find the one not saluting
Third green one down from the car window.
Isn’t that his tail just behind the brown one to his right?
Well, damn, it looks like you’re right! I went back and checked past posts about this and the tail is indeed there and couldn’t belong to any other snake, although it is positioned oddly behind the brown one. I could swear back when this came out there was definitely no tail there. Real Mandela Effect moment! It appears that if they were trying to reference this event, they failed.
Woulda been a cool easter egg to throw in for sure.
Link bc I’d forgotten the guy’s name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_Landmesser
No one was really threatened with violence to join the Nazi party.
It never was a decision between joining and dying, or joining and going to prison.The choice for most was joining or losing an opportunity to advance their career.
Even the guards at the concentration camps did the job voluntarily. Being offered the position was a chance to live like a medieval lord, with a mansion, servants, and actual direct power over people’s lives. The alternative was to continue living a mediocre life in Germany. That was enough incentive for enough people to staff the camps.
