SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoShe must be unhingedlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square60fedilinkarrow-up1588arrow-down14
arrow-up1584arrow-down1imageShe must be unhingedlemmy.dbzer0.comSnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square60fedilink
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·3 hours agoThe military budget is 36x bigger than NASA. Mars could be the 51st state if the US were not so war hungry.
minus-squarePlexSheep@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoMars colonizing is not really a useful idea, it’s technically somewhat possible but there isn’t a lot to gain from it. Instead, keeping the earth habitable would be much more useful.
minus-squareSzyler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 hour agoThe technology needed to inhabit Mars would 100% benefit the life on earth. Just lookup all the tech we got from the Apollo missions.
minus-squareVespair@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoI dunno, I see a lot of value in living on a planet with no conservatives
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 hours agoYes, there are a lot of better things we could be spending the enormous military budget on. I chose NASA because it’s the closest to military spending while still being peaceful.
The military budget is 36x bigger than NASA.
Mars could be the 51st state if the US were not so war hungry.
Mars colonizing is not really a useful idea, it’s technically somewhat possible but there isn’t a lot to gain from it.
Instead, keeping the earth habitable would be much more useful.
The technology needed to inhabit Mars would 100% benefit the life on earth. Just lookup all the tech we got from the Apollo missions.
I dunno, I see a lot of value in living on a planet with no conservatives
Yes, there are a lot of better things we could be spending the enormous military budget on.
I chose NASA because it’s the closest to military spending while still being peaceful.