• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      27 minutes ago

      Every now and then I read one of those panicked articles raising the alarm about how some member of the young generation doesn’t understand folder structures or whatever, and I panic for a second because what if an entire generation grows up not knowing how to use a computer? But then I remember that I’ve read stories upon stories from Reddit and assorted boomer sites from the 90s and aughts about the exact sort of tech support problems described in that article, and that I’ve never met someone my age or younger who can’t touchtype at least 60 words a minute, and that my sister for whom a command line is the scariest thing in the universe figured out how to install ReShade for a DirectX game she liked all on her own, and that our parents talked the exact same way about cars, and I calm down.

    • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Late Gen x and early gen y had an off-line childhood and digital adulthood. I think that explains a fair amount about computer literacy, because a lot of what they were exposed to is the base config so they had to learn their way up.

      although I find that there are plenty of both that are absolutely clueless about tech

      Another weird thing that changed in that generation was communication style. Sms and email bred their own language and abbreviations…

      Other notables - digital wayfinding (online maps and Gps), music purchase and consumption, proliferation of social media, adoption of online persona, all changes that gen x / early y lived through.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      TL;DR? Why not just go watch another five second video of a kitten with its head in a toilet roll, or a 140 character description of a meal your friend just stuffed in their mouth. “nom nom”. This blog post is not for you.

      wow, this some next level obnoxious boomer shit.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          there is no statement there so I don’t know what you mean by “incorrect”. all i see is someone who doesn’t know how people use tldr.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Was it too long for you and you didn’t read it?

            In that case …This blog post is not for you.

            That’s what the question mark does. It marks a question.

            RTFA? RTFA!

          • taladar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.

            • pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              54 minutes ago

              valuing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.