• the_strange
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t have any confirmations of your points

      The kernel and its changes are open source, you can just look at the changes that were made.

        • the_strange
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Your words, not mine. If they were afraid of malicious code coming from these sources they would’ve removed them earlier and not only after their legal department recommend these maintainers be removed.

          Open source doesn’t mean that malicious code isn’t impossible though. For a project as large as the Linux kernel it is unlikely, but see the xz-utils incident earlier this year for example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils_backdoor

          • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes I expected that argument. My point was there was no valid reason to remove them. The xz case didn’t convince any other projects to get rid of maintainers based on their nationality after all.

            It’s obviously my own opinion that what Linus did was an nonnegotiable red flag but I’d prefer to stick with it for now. I guess making this discussion political was a pretty harmful decision so I’ll remove some of my replies in order to avoid creating more drama.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you russian by any chance?

      Because it’s rare to see the words “anti-russia lies” anywhere else.