cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agoWhy Veracrypt not in flatpak?message-squaremessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down124
arrow-up1-21arrow-down1message-squareWhy Veracrypt not in flatpak?cplusplus@programming.dev to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-211 hours agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareLemongrab@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 day agoYou can give a Flatpak the necessary permissions to modify disks. All the permissions needed by Veracrypt could be granted.
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoI haven’t used veracrypt to encrypt linux system partitions. Does it do all the decryption in user space somehow?
minus-squareReversalHatchery@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·23 hours agoand then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
minus-squareJustMarkov@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·23 hours ago and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.
You can give a Flatpak the necessary permissions to modify disks. All the permissions needed by Veracrypt could be granted.
I haven’t used veracrypt to encrypt linux system partitions. Does it do all the decryption in user space somehow?
and then what’s the benefit of having veracrypt as a flatpak package? that it can be used with older dependencies? if so, is that a good thing to have for things that modify system startup?
Flatpaks is a universal package format, it works almost everywhere. Also, there are immutable distros, that use flatpak as the default package format.