Full video

https://t.me/Rarog_24OMBr/304

In the face of death, the occupiers show their true essence. They throw their helmets hysterically, fight back with automatic weapons, try to escape, but get what they deserve. A forest of EW antennas on the back of one of the occupiers did not help to escape from the “penal sanctions” of the soldiers of the “Rarog” Battalion of the 24th OMBr.

  • mormund
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What awful waste of human lives. And I guess there is no good way to die in war, but this just seems so atrocious for everyone involved

        • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          As long as nobody starts, not playing is the easiest way to avoid defeat. But if one player plays, the rest must follow or lose. And as long as either keeps playing, neither can stop. That is the tragedy of war: Easy to start, hard to end, until the fire runs out of fuel and only ruin is left.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Every death and every kill that will haunt a soldier in this shit show is on Putin’s head.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No, it is not just Putin. Stop excusing all of Russia. They want the war, the see it as patriotic to fight the evil ukrainians. It is not just Putin the same way it was not just Hitler.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            That’s funny, I constantly hear people complaining about the opposite sentiment from the .ml community. It’s a very common complaint around Lemmy that the ‘tankies’ from .ml defend Russia. So, it’s weird to hear someone say that saying negative things about Russia is somehow ‘.ml behavior’.

            • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              They’re not saying “negative things about Russia”. On the contrary, they’re trying to minimize the atrocities commited by russian “soldiers” and their superiors, by blaming 1 singular person.

              As if, if putin disappeared, all will suddenly be rainbows and unicorns, russians and ukrainians best buds.

              • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I see now. I think I was confused because it looked like you replied to the comment that you were agreeing with, but you were referring to the comment above that one as the .ml account. My bad.

    • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I mean honestly, I would not consider it because drones are tiny and quick. I don’t think I’d be able to shoot one.

      • bluGill@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Depends on what you are shooting with. A standard military rifle would be a difficult shot. A standard hunting shotgun has a good chance - though a shotgun doesn’t have much range.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          But depending on direction your fired ammo can fall on someone else on your side and now not only are you dead but you killed someone else via friendly fire.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You have to be extraordinarily unlucky to be hit by a wild shot at range. Unless there’s someone right behind the drone it’s not going to matter.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Well if I was forced to fight like these poor bastards likely where then I doubt that would be a concern.

            Also you are very much underestimating the ballistic properties of those rifles. At such an angle those rounds are not landing within a km of this fight.

        • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That is true, but I feel my chances would be smaller if I were fucking around with grabbing my gun from my back first

          • Dashi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            If you are in an active combat zone, your gun shouldn’t be on your back :) unless you are on base but none of these looked like they were. Unless you are talking about switching to a shotgun like some people were mentioning.

            Either way this is definitely a new dynamic to modern warfare.

            • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yeah that’s fair. Good thing I’m not in the army I guess haha. I wouldn’t be a good fit anyways >.<

  • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Serious question: would carrying a shotgun in the field be worth the additional weight? Would it be feasible to switch to the shotgun and kill it before it got into lethal range?

    • dukatos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Shotgun has a short effective range, about 70-100m depending of ammunition and gauge. If the drone explodes it still can hurt the shooter and people around. But, I guess it is a better option than just to wait for death.

    • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Totally a keyboard warrior reply, but I suspect that since most of those videos show individual or pair of soldiers, its after their squad was destroyed and these guys are remainder. They probably also hear a lot of drones flying around during the day, so even if they are loud as hell, maybe you “get used” to it and don’t react as quick.

      Probably don’t expect every soldier to carry shotguns so depending who survives the first contact, might not have a right weapon. Also I don’t actually know what is Russian squads go to load-outs are. It would be interesting to know if Ukrainian squads who have western training keep up with similar load outs as touted by western armies (where people have roles and equipment to suit). But as we rarely see videos of successful interceptions, its probably not something Ukraine would be quick to share.

      Take all this with a ton of salt though, I have no sources, just assumptions. Would be great to hear from professional soldiers with actual combat experience though.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think a semi-auto shotgun would definitely be worth it. I think armies should also add skeet shooting to boot camp and have skeet shooting specialized troops in every squad going forward.

      • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        It just seems self evident, you’d think it would at least be considered. Every drone death I have seen the target is clearly aware of the drone and has had time to react and run.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe. Getting a shotgun out, and pointed in the right direction is not instant. I can do it fairly fast when I’m hunting, but I keep plenty of extra paddles in my canoe so that after shooting I can go find the dropped paddles. I’m not sure if soldiers are in position to safely throw whatever they have in their hands. I’m also not sure if having a shotgun is worth the extra weight when they don’t need it.

          For sure this needs a military expert to weigh in on. Though I doubt they are talking yet.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Would Skeet shooting be applicable here? I thought a good part of the skill with Skeet was seeing the flight path of the target and anticipating where its going to be then shooting, but all of that in skeet is dependent on linear paths and no other change in velocity from the clay pigeon. Drones don’t behave that way. They speed up, they slow down, they hover, they go left, right, up, down, backwards, forwards and seemingly random intervals.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I haven’t tried my shotgun on real drones, but I would expect it makes no difference. Once you point in the right direction and pull the trigger the shot leaves fast enough such that I don’t expect a drone can move too far.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            I wasn’t saying the drone would move out of the way between the time you line up the target and pull the trigger, but instead that drones move so quickly and unpredictable that you may never get lined up on the target.

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Birds are not exactly predictable (depends on the bird, geese fly in a V and are very predictable, but other birds are erratic), but I’m not sure how different they are. Either way, you only need a more or less straight path for about 1 second, and you get multiple shots. Though if the drone is coming at you it still have momentum bringing it to you and shotguns don’t have much range.

              I could see this working as a reasonable shot with a shotgun - but I could also see how it couldn’t and so I want someone in the military to tell me what works. (I’m willing to try on a range if you supply the drones - but at the price of drones I’m not willing to try this myself - and it goes without saying I’m not interested in going to a real battle field with all the other concerns that brings)

              • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Someone should invent an absolutely minimal cost drone for short term flights at a person to practice shooting them down.

                • bluGill@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  I don’t want battery toxic waste all over my shooting range (lead is bad enough - I try to use lead free shot).

      • thesporkeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I wonder what fraction of a Ukrainian soldier’s time is spent with occupied hands where they can’t ready weapon and acquire target within a few seconds. Probably not too common in open battlefield, and you could have a designated drone spotter for those periods if that’s not already a thing.