• uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Bluesky is decentralized only in its name. And media storage.

    • Sl00k@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This isn’t necessarily true. Just because their architecture is harder and not a simple server host does not strip away its decentralization.

      They have decentralized the following:

      • App access (can build your own or show openProto posts in your platform

      • Algorithms

      • Firehouse (backend albeit rumored to be expensive)

      • More if you consider the domain name hosting stuff and media storage control. Also moderation is planned to be decentralized.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Isn’t the only thing that really matters decentralised control?

        Open protocols and APIs seem pretty meaningless to me if there’s a single point of control for the brand.

        If everyone migrates to bluesky and then bluesky says “of we’re not doing that open thing anymore because of this new embiggened thing we’re doing” everyone will still be on bluesky.