rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agoClimate Rulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1266arrow-down10
arrow-up1266arrow-down1imageClimate Rulesh.itjust.worksrambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 5 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarerambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up68·5 months agoNow the fun part: guess the y-axis
minus-squareWilzax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoYou lose accuracy if you show addition of components on a log scale, so if true this is a terrible graph
minus-squareitslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up22·5 months agoAnnual, since there are occasional drops
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543linkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 months agoMakes sense. We haven’t yet made it since the great plague, I guess, to decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Now the fun part: guess the y-axis
log(something)?
You lose accuracy if you show addition of components on a log scale, so if true this is a terrible graph
log(log(something))?
Annually (Gt/a) or total (Gt).
Annual, since there are occasional drops
Makes sense. We haven’t yet made it since the great plague, I guess, to decrease the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.