cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/3536782

Archived link

China should set a “strong but achievable” target of slashing emissions at least 30 percent by 2035 when it submits updated climate commitments in coming months, a report urged Thursday.

Signatories to the 2015 Paris climate accord must announce by next February their updated roadmaps to achieve the treaty’s goal of limiting global temperature rises.

China currently aims to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2060.

But its policies and targets are rated “highly insufficient” to limit global warming to 1.5 Celcius above pre-industrial levels, according to the Climate Action Tracker project.

The Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), a think tank that tracks climate progress, said Beijing should aim for an absolute emissions reduction target of 30 percent.

As the world’s largest emitter, China’s “ambition in its climate agenda is decisive for keeping the international community on track,” CREA said in a report.

To meet that target, Beijing would need to slash electricity sector emissions by 30 percent and emissions from industry by a quarter. It should also set a target of reducing non-CO2 emissions by more than 35 percent, the group said.

[…]

But Teng Fei, deputy director of Tsinghua University’s Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, called the “extreme” goal of a 30 percent emissions cut “too ambitious to be achievable”.

“I think China is in the process of stabilising its emissions, so it’s quite uncertain, for this period, to what extent China can reduce its overall emissions,” he said.

China is currently moving to bolster its flagging housing market, which could trigger higher demand in industry, and increase emissions.

[…]

Coal installation is continuing [in China] in a bid to secure baseload supply, and methane emissions are also rising.

[…]

  • basmatii@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    They’re the same thing, China’s CO2 emissions are high because: they take it n the bulk of the Wests manufacturing, and they doing a lot of extra manufacturing to lower their emissions long term.

    China does think in quarters or years, but decades. Their goals have been met, and are precessing as planned to a) lower manufacturing demand by outsourcing the dirtiest labor like the West did to china, and b) eliminate dirty sources of energy production.

    They have already beat every single other nation in every single category in relation to lowering their emissions, while still getting blamed for emissions that should be attributed to the West as the primary consumers of the goods produced.

    When the US installs 30GW of solar a year, let me know, until then this report, like every China bad report in the last decade, is horribly biased, poorly sourced, and solely was made to ease the ego of the West after constant failure.

    • 0x815OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      You continue to engage in whataboutism. What a waste of time.

      • basmatii@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        You continue to not understand words, Mr Shapiro. My hats off to your dedication.

        Anyway, China passes US GDP next quarter especially after the hurricanes, and I’m sure you’ll post another twenty anti China articles about why that’s the end of the world.

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      China’s consumption-based emissions per capita are virtually as high as the EU’s now. It is not accurate to say China is only emitting because it is making things for the West.

      They have already beat every single other nation in every single category in relation to lowering their emissions

      Except actually lowering emissions, which China has not done at all.

      Installing heaps of solar is great. Doing so does not offset also installing heaps of fossil fuel power, which it has also done