• LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no argument for “both sides bad” when one side is currently right now this instant blowing up hospitals, schools, and children. One side is objectively worse and it’s the side hiding behind the skirts of “antisemitism” as they carry out an Arabic genocide

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree.

      Both sides are bad, no matter who is currently the aggressor.

      Now because there is aggression, the aggressor has an obligation to stop it, and we have an obligation to force a stop in the conflict as well. But that doesn’t make the other party less Bad in this. Both sides killed a lot of innocent people, both have inhumane ulterior motives and both are supporting further escalation. But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.

      This distinction is very important to me, because you are not suddenly the good guy because you stopped killing civilians. You are just not actively doing war crimes which means we don’t have to intervene because of you anymore, which is at least one less reason. But you are not holy because “this year it was only 300 war crimes”.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Both have inhuman ulterior motives”

        Palestine wants to be free

        Israel wants to genocide Palestine and live in their homes

        Yes I can see how wanting liberty and self governance is exactly the same as wanting more land for your historically landless people regardless of how many natives you have to kill. Completely balanced