“Small comic based on the amazing words of Ursula K. Le Guin”.

author

  • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    This isn’t good historical analysis. The feudal class society, with its aristocracy, church and peasants, was highly rigid in terms of class mobility. Peasants stayed peasants and aristocrats stayed aristocrats. The current dominant class, the capitalist owners, exert their power not by god-given rights over the population, but by legal control of the means of production. The current exploited class, the workers, aren’t tied to a lord anymore and pay tributes in kind on exchange for land and protection, but instead are “free” to work where they want for a payment in cash, and unable for the most part to have ownership of the means of production they themselves work.

    Kings have disappeared, classes in society haven’t

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Up until the last part I thought your point was going to be “but now we have class mobility”. Yeah, we don’t 😫 freedom is an illusion for the most part, but a convenient one

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Accepting the existence of class mobility doesn’t imply freedom. Freedom to exploit your fellow workers and become a class traitor isn’t freedom. It’s just a fact that social mobility has increased significantly

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Nah, I meant that workers really don’t have freedom, but we are led to believe that we do have it, because it’s convenient for the rich