• Anivia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not including protein powders in the protein chart is pretty stupid. Whey protein is cheaper per gram than anything else on that chart, and vegan protein powders (like soy or pea protein) are even cheaper

  • Ersatz86@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Really superb and informational graphic. I’d sure love to see one done by protein per gram/cost. Any chance someone could reach out to the Reddit OP to ask, cause my privileges have been revoked? Pretty please?

      • cron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Grains are “better” than I would have expected.

        • pipes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I so wish we could get actual wheat grains at the supermarket, possibly bio. Instead whole cereals are mostly sold as animal feed (so with fewer safety standards). It’s bs. Same goes for soy beans! They give 'em out to farmers for a lot less than a 1€/kg as animal feed, but I have to order them online? While every corner shop has tofu, soy milk, etc… come on 😅

    • pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I remember seeing a youtube vid from someone who had analyzed all products from one supermarket (after scraping their website), cheapest protein ended up being flour 😄

      After all people can survive on bread, on average if I remember correctly we need just 11-13% of the calories to be protein according to WHO (or less if we are eating with a caloric surplus)… protein needs are vastly exaggerated thanks to health gurus and humans’ unhealthy love of meat.

      Btw flour and bread are not all the same, especially refined has very little fiber and a little less protein (protein content is used also to determine quality of wheat)

  • 7EP6vuI
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    nice graph, what is the “calories per gram of food” or “caloric density” dimension/axis good for?

    only use-case i can think of is something like packing food for hiking? other than that calories per gram of food is quite irrelevant, or am i missing something?

    • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Some people walk to get groceries.

      edit: on the flip side, if you’re trying to lose weight, then eating low density food would probably fill you up faster. So more apples and less sunflower seeds.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s good to point out how dense they are when shopping. Cause you might be like “walnuts are so expensive per pound, no way they’re worth it!” when really they are, they are just crazy dense.

      Also if you are caring about “bulk” eating, where you want to make sure your stomach feels full all day, you want more things on the left side cause you’ll feel like you are eating more food.

      so it is interesting I felt!

      • 7EP6vuI
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        yes, interesting, i just wondered if i’m missing something, maybe my statement was a bit too negative :-/

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          People who live in poverty could use this graph to plan the cheapest way to get their calories to avoid starving with very little money.

          Is that what you’re missing?

  • whereisk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pistachios seem awfully cheap from what I know pistachios to cost even considering high caloric density.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PBKZZ51?tag=sacapuntas9-20&linkCode=osi&th=1&psc=1

      4160 calories for 14.23

      Coming out to 292 calories per dollar, or around 30 cents for 100 calories. Looks to be about where it’s at! He might have found an even cheaper source. I think this chart does a great job of pointing out that just because things like almonds are more per pound than chicken, doesn’t mean they aren’t better deals if you are concerned with energy.

      • whereisk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow, they are incredibly cheap in the US - in Australia they are nearly double the price per kg.

        • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh yeah he mentions his source is Walmart in a specific state, but amazon is more consistent here.

          Always interesting to hear how different stuff is in different countries!

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s a dock worker strike on the East Coast. That banana price is going to skyrocket for a little while.

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fingers crossed for them! I hope they get the wages they need to not need to live by this chart, and guarantees that even as the docks modernize the workers will have good paying jobs regardless.

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m calling BS on tuna being more expensive than chix wings…depends on grade of tuna. Wings are expensive AF!

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well we can easily check! It says they used Walmart.

      Here’s the cheapest per ounce I see for tuna:

      https://www.walmart.com/ip/Great-Value-Chunk-Light-Tuna-in-Water-5-oz-4-Pack/33867594?classType=VARIANT&athbdg=L1200&from=/search

      It’s 3.22 for 400 calories, so one dollar gets you 124 calories of tuna.

      Then cheapest wings I see at $3 a pound, and have 4,840 calories for 24 dollars, coming out to 200 calories per dollar:

      https://www.walmart.com/ip/Great-Value-All-Natural-Chicken-Wing-Sections-8-lb-Frozen/124310906?classType=REGULAR&from=/search

      So for me doing the math JUST off packaging (he appears to use a nutritional calculator) it’s coming up chicken wings is cheaper source of calories.

      So it’s possible in this persons state their chicken was slightly cheaper, and they didn’t have the generic tuna. But even in my state where chicken costs a little bit more than what is listed, and my tuna costs a little less, chicken wings are still close to 50% cheaper for calories.

      I wonder if it’s just a “Feeling” thing, because a little can of tuna is just a dollar! That must be cheap, right?.. but a can of tuna is 100 calories, which isn’t a great deal.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That depends on where you are what time of year it is. I can get wings on sale for $1.99/lb fairly regular. The only fish I can get that cheap is tilapia.

      • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah canned tuna is almost always a dollar for a dinky little can of 100 calories. A pound of wings has many times that, with the online one I found being $3/lb.

        So I guess this chart is doing a pretty good job at breaking up some preconceived notions!

    • pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Idk what their source was but I think you should look for cheapest “possible” to do a fair comparison (cause obviously a certain shop can have super expensive wings). Near me lowest for wings will be 3-5€/kg, canned tuna starts from 8/kg when on discount, but also has like 30% of seed or olive oil in it (so actual tuna cost to the consumer is more like 12€/kg minimum) Chicken is definitely cheaper everywhere IME.

      BTW I’m talking raw chicken wings…everything pre-cooked costs more

    • ericbomb@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah shouldn’t a real shocker for anyone who compares prices and calories!

      Only thing that caught me off guard is pork belly is chilling down by potatoes in cost per calorie! But given how fatty pork belly is, I guess it makes sense!

  • Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need a graph of vending machine items cost-per-calorie. I know I could get an 800 calorie honeybun for $1. But that was 2000s numbers.

  • Kowowow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Locally at least Costco precooked chicken nuggets are 6.99 a kg which is the cheapest meat they have I think