• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    I like evil/spacemacs because I can get my vim fix virtually, because emacs from a software engineering perspective is beautiful!

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    After 30 years coding in college and professionally, this is the ordering:

    • anything else
    • sed -i
    • vi

    It’s the worst vietnam-era throwback mess I’ve ever seen. And in 30 years, I’ve seen some serious crap.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If I wanted to hear about what’s good about Vim, should I:

    a) ask what’s good about vim

    -OR-

    b) assert blindly that there is nothing good about vim so fanboys will come crawling out of the walls tripping over each other to tell me how I’m wrong?

    • Classy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      To add to your line of query, what if I don’t give a shit about writing code and I just use Linux as a casual laptop user? I’ve never looked at vim or emacs, I use Kate and OnlyOffice

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter we will tell you either way.

      • Instead of simply shortcuts, vim uses “chords”. Every new shortcut I learn can be combined intuitively* with all the other shortcuts I know.
      • Because of this there’s no faster way to edit files than Vim in the hands of an experienced user.
      • this let’s me spend almost no time editing code, freeing up the rest of my time for swearing at piss poor documentation.

      * I use “intuitively” here in a way that not merely stretches, but outright abuses the definition of the word.

      • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 minutes ago

        It’s intuitive if your previous editor was ed(1) and you’re using an ADM-3A-like keyboard.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Vim has been around long enough that I’ve found anything I want to figure out how to do has been discussed many times on various places around the internet and have yet to fail to find what I’m looking for with a search.

    • babybus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You shouldn’t talk about vim at all! Just write that vscode is the most flexible code editor.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’ve seen vscode fill up home directories unnecessarily when run on the machine directly as well as remotely!

        IMO vscode is a perfect example of recent software that looks great from a features pov but horrible from an efficient implementation pov. I loved it until I hated it.

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah hx. It was hx that finally made me use vi style navigation and now I choose vim over nano almost always.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m halfway between hx and vim, I vastly prefer the helix/kakoune philosophy of selection, then action over vim, but I’m dearly missing plug-in support for Helix

        • Lupec@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I was going to point to visual.nvim as a possible middle ground, but it’s now archived :(

          Disclaimer: I haven’t actually tested it myself

          • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’m just gonna be patient. Vanilla Helix is very much usable for everything I need it for at the moment, with built in LSP support, and plug-in support is on the horizon. Not sure when exactly, but it’s gonna happen eventually

            • Lupec@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 minutes ago

              Yeah I’m with you there, vanilla helix meets basically 90% of my needs so I’m not in any real rush to change

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Once you try Vim you will never use another text editor. Or any other program for that matter because you won’t be able to exit.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I also had that experience with emacs, which has a built in help system. I couldn’t find a topic on ‘exit’ or ‘quit’ and refused to just search online.

      Took me half an hour.

      • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        and refused to just search online

        Unless you were f*cked by your ISP as I am right now, that’s having some balls. Or being masochist. But nothing in between

        • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yes. Though I believe it only kills the current frame if there are multiple

      • 299792458ms@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I tried Micro and I found that its just Nano with a better interface and much easier to use. Its great actually but I like the vim movements.

    • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      Getting used to vim has made nano unusable for me. The muscle memory is too strong. That and all of the regex and plugin features (ex. LSP) are just too useful.

      • ArchAengelus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        I had the same experience. Nano is great if you’re used to notepad or a generic, limited text editor.

        Once you learn a terminal editor like eMacs or vim, why go back? So much less hand motion going to mouse, arrows, and back.

    • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m sure someone already made a graph plotting the hours wasted learning vs the seconds gained not moving your mouse.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        This. If it was your sole tool for daily tasks it makes sense, once a month to edit a config file…not so much.

        When I started working we had HP Unix Silicon Graphics systems, VI was our only text editor…so I have some commands as muscle memory. The rest of commands I open my tractor feed help printout from 30 years ago

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Nice.

          I’ve been using Vim daily for about 20 years, it saves me 30 minutes at a time regularly.

          I’m approaching break-even on the learning curve!

          I’m kidding…mostly.