A fixation on system change alone opens the door to a kind of cynical self-absolution that divorces personal commitment from political belief. This is its own kind of false consciousness, one that threatens to create a cheapened climate politics incommensurate with this urgent moment.

[…]

Because here’s the thing: When you choose to eat less meat or take the bus instead of driving or have fewer children, you are making a statement that your actions matter, that it’s not too late to avert climate catastrophe, that you have power. To take a measure of personal responsibility for climate change doesn’t have to distract from your political activism—if anything, it amplifies it.

  • ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    the corporations will not save us. be very wary of any “solution” that allows you to continue unchanged and to shift all responsibility to someone else, there’s a reason that perspective is so pervasive

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      File under “green washing.”

      If a company offers a more expensive “choice” of a greener option, rather than just being ecologically responsible by default, then you are being sold a product. That is, you get to express your superior “green” ethics by identifying with your purchase.

      The company doesn’t actually care about the environment. They’re just doing the minimum to capture extra $$$

      • The_Terrible_Humbaba@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m not completely sure of what point you’re making. Would you buy the cheaper product even if you could afford the more expensive green one?

        Because if the answer is “no”, then you are still agreeing with OP; and if the answer is “yes” then you are saying you want to knowingly buy something that is harmful for the environment and encourage a company to make more of it, while deflecting responsibly and saying that corpos and govs are the ones who have to do something.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like I’m all for that we need to hold a fire under corporations. But we also need to change too. Just because they do like, 70% of it doesn’t mean we’re off the hook. We’re buying those products that they pollute for. We drive the cars that are polluting. We buy the cheap clothes that they shamelessly pollute. We each have to change.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yep. Who did Dasani bottle all that water for? Paying humans with mouths

      • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Corporations have absolutely no incentive to change, consumers need to vote with their wallets if they want something to happen. But no, everytime someone points out this blindingly obvious fact we get the “uhm actually corporations need to change, it’s not my fault they’re feeding off my unsustainable habits.”

        We have to work together, we only have power to effect change when we work together, solidarity is our strength.