• yannic@lemmy.ca
    2·
    45 minutes ago

    There are many examples of this, but one that comes immediately to mind is the evolution of my favourite LDAP-enabled music player, airsonic-advanced

    Subsonic begat libresonic Libresonic begat airsonic as well as a whole bunch of other projects. Airsonic begat airsonic-advanced Airsonic-advanced begat kagemomiji/airsonic-advanced, however the maintainer of the parent codebase, randomnicode, wants to do the right thing and get their code up to snuff with the opensubsonic API (not sure where that fits in to thr history) so kagemomji can take over.

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.worldEnglish
    28·
    4 hours ago

    CyanogenMod, which was the base of most custom Android ROMs at one point. After taking venture funding, incompetent business majors crashed and burned the project trying to commercialize it. It was then forked and LineageOS was born.

    • Otter@lemmy.caEnglish
      2·
      1 hour ago

      I remember hearing about Cyanogen way back when, didn’t realize LineageOS was forked from it

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      111·
      3 hours ago

      My big question is, why not fork the original first and commercialize that instead. So much forking around the wrong ways! /s

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        4·
        2 hours ago

        Because business majors only know how to exploit good things that would be better off without them.

        If the good thing is left to just be better off without them – while they fuck around with a separate thing – then people will never be interested in the business majors’ product.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        7·
        3 hours ago

        MBAs love taking an existing brand and sucking whatever value they can extract. Like chupacabras but for functioning and useful products.

  • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
    16·
    6 hours ago

    DuckStation recently changed to a source-available license that prohibits distributing modified versions of the software and prohibits commercial use. Before, it was GPLv3.

    Also OpenOffice, Emby, Audacity, Android (AOSP) (soft forked to LineageOS and GrapheneOS, but no hard fork)

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.worldEnglish
      7·
      6 hours ago

      It has been on my list to figure out how to move to forgejo, need to do it soon before the migration process breaks or gets awful.

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        8·
        3 hours ago

        If you’re using docker: change your image name from gitea to forgejo. Repull. Done. Baremetal should be just as simple. Migrations are as easy as leaving all the data in-place and changing the binary at this moment in time.

  • Zangoose@lemmy.world
    53·
    11 hours ago

    Audacity was the first one I thought of.

    Or MultiMC, PolyMC, the Sodium mod, or the original Minecraft Forge.

    (Minecraft community devs need to stop having drama lmao)

      • Zangoose@lemmy.world
        5·
        3 hours ago

        The lead developer changed the license to a much less permissive one because of drama surrounding being credited in modpacks. The dev thinks there are forks that exist solely to sidestep crediting the original mod, I’m not up to date enough on Minecraft modding lore to know if this is true or not.

        I’m pretty sure there’s also a fork that branches off of the last GPL commit but I forget what it’s called.

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          1·
          3 hours ago

          Doesn’t GPL technically require you to attribute the upstream anyway?

          The work must carry prominent notices stating that you modified it, and giving a relevant date.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.deEnglish
            1·
            2 hours ago

            Most open sorce licenses do, not just the GPL. I’m not sure what Minecraft modpackers do. But in the free and open source world, you’ll always find that attribution. Sometimes they have a list who wrote the software and who maintained it for what timespan.

      • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
        9·
        6 hours ago

        I actually had to look it up as I couldn’t remember why I made the first switch. PolyMC was forked from MultiMC after they dropped third-party modpack support. Then there was some drama with one of the devs of PolyMC, spawning Prism Launcher

    • Korne127@lemmy.world
      25·
      11 hours ago

      I love how well the PolyMC -> PrismLauncher transition went. It’s great that the asshole owning it didn’t just spew transphobic hate, but also removed the contribution rights to all other people, leading them to immediately flock to an alternative.

  • azthec@feddit.nl
    4·
    7 hours ago

    Maybe a bit niche, but if you’re in the Scala ecosystem and seen what happened with Akka -> Apache Pekko. Version one of Pekko was a 1-1 rename of Akka

  • devilish666@lemmy.world
    4·
    7 hours ago

    I hope someone made STACER (a.k.a Bleachbit on roids) remastered
    The owner of that project already abandoned it, it’s sad STACER already had so…much potential compared to Bleachbit but no one wants to revive it

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        9·
        7 hours ago

        Here’s a comment about it I made a few weeks back in the context of why Jellyfin came to be and why I only ever recommend Plex or Jellyfin

        This is going to go back quite a ways, and much of my knowledge is old at this point so some details might be off.

        ~15 years ago Plex as we know it started out as an OSX fork of the 0G Xbox homebrew software XBMC (Later renamed Kodi (For those who don’t know, XBMC was XBox Media Center and would turn the 0g Xbox into the cheapest Home Theater PC you could get at the time, man those were the days lol))

        Plex was only briefly open source and then was quickly closed when they incorporated a year or so after they had something functional. They never made any promises about not charging or being open source or anything, so that’s why I’m generally fine with Plex

        Sometime around 2012ish Emby came along as THE open source alternative to Plex and things were good. MOST of it was supposed to stay open source as was promised. From the beginning they kept build scripts n such closed source, probably should have caught on them, but heh ya know hindsight and all that.

        Then around 2014/5 they took it all closed source, relicensed it and introduced their paywall including locking away already existing features. This is what pissed me and many others off and this is when and why Jellyfin split off promising to be truly fully open source forever. (There was a ton of drama about it at the time, but it looks like Embys Q&A thing a bit back doesn’t even bother to mention it, imagine that lol)

        I don’t have a problem with subscriptions on open source software myself, but the way they went about it…yea. fuck em

    • superkret
      2·
      2 hours ago

      Any good alternatives that use the same engine, but aren’t just “Firefox after rustling the about:config a bit”?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      231·
      11 hours ago

      It’s Mozilla that’s slowly enshittifying, Firefox itself is theoretically insulated from the worst decisions they could make, but those safeguards are going to be put to the test real soon I bet.