superkret to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agoThat explains it.imagemessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.superkret to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 hours agomessage-square134fedilink
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·9 hours agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·41 minutes agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 hours agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it