• BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Fediscovery is needed, but the project being led by Mastodon is concerning. Mastodon often refuses to follow ActivityPub standards and bullies people into accepting their flawed FEPs by “reminding everyone” of their size of the user base.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I think they find themselves in a position they didn’t really ask for by being so huge that they’re suddenly defining a lot of things. With that many users depending on your product, change necessarily becomes slower and you have to test things to a whole different level before implementing anything. I kind of see why it can be tricky to make technical changes to their ActivityPub implementation at this point, especially as people are yelling left and right for different and often contradicting features.

      Sure, it has some negative consequences, but Mastodon’s success is still only a good thing, and I don’t think there’s any good reason at all to expect bad intent from any of it’s developers.

      In other news, I’m getting really tired of all the shit they’re receiving.