• macniel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      yeah, messing with apt just to push a service really doesn’t sit well. And they don’t stop there, snaps are preferred over apt packages in Ubuntu Land.

    • Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Do feel it is designed to scare normal users though.

      Like how the GUI software updater now shows a list of security updates, and then “there are more security updates available with Ubuntu pro” in the list of updates…. the obvious implication is “you’re computer has other known vulnerabilities that can only be fixed if you pay up”.

      Liiittlle bit ransomey and let be honest that’s by design.

      Wouldn’t consider myself part of the anti canonical pitchfork crowd but that new behaviour did irk me somewhat.

      If Microsoft did that people would be up in arms. Appreciate canonical provide Ubuntu is free but normal users wouldn’t get that nuance as they don’t think they pay for windows.

    • Oisteink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      No - and if they left it at that it would be great. I had to clean up 25 devices that had ububtu Lts, and that advantage had enabled the repos for thst shit, so apt wouldnt even do a dist-upgrade to prepare for do-release-upgrade.

      Its not just the OS either, they are cancer to oss with their mixed «community» and enterprise stuff.

      They only ever open source as little as they can.

      Sell services, not code