• gandalf_der_12te@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s more like a hundred thousand years for humans on earth to go extinct, and another nine hundred thousand to clean the traces.

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The sad thing is, if we want life as we know it (that includes horses happily munching on grass) to continue existing, humans are it’s only shot.

    It might be edgy and cool to wish humanity would go instinct, but with it, potentially all life will go instinct.

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      For sure.

      But tbf it’s still a bold assumption that afte only a million years biodiversity would rebound to the point to support (mega)fauna like that again.

      Hoping for the best.

      • Johanno@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually the fauna comes back really quick. After only a hundred years when nothing is maintenaned the plants will cover most of our infrastructure.

        After probably 500 years most constructions are probably only hills.

  • Sordid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s cute and all, but it ain’t gonna be birds and deer who gets life off this rock once the Sun starts threatening to swallow it in a few billion years. We’re screwing up badly in the short term, but we’re the only hope Earth life has in the long term.

    • BlackLodgeCooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When the tectonic plates collide again to form another supercontinent, it will create enough heat to kill off most, if not all, mammals. And it will happen before the sun destroys everything, probably in around 250 million years or so.