• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    My theory is that all traffic planning in Germany is being done by drunk chimpanzees. This confirms it yet again.

    • Sailing7@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Jesus, i saw that picture and thought

      well murica and their anti pedestrian street designs

      Then read your comment.

      Checked the picture.

      Zoomed in. there is text.

      in disbelief

      thats actually a german crossing.

      Got angry and dumbfounded at the same time.

      What piece of shit is this crossing?!

      Towards whatever Communityplanners on meth that did this: Fix this shit!

      • Pechente
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        5 months ago

        Towards whatever Communityplanners on meth that did this: Fix this shit!

        The city planner: „What do you mean? This intersection is just fine. I drive my car through it every day.“

        • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          And it complies with all regulations. As long as we comply with regulations, we don’t have to come up with reasonable solutions.

      • PwnTra1n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        5 months ago

        You can easily tell it’s not American because it’s even there in the first place. You don’t get a sign explaining the bike paths and crosswalks in America. You just gotta know or get fucked. Also we wouldn’t have a complicated bike route we just wouldn’t have one, solves that issue…

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        See, I watch Adam Something videos from the point of view that he’s not really talking about America. He’s talking about European politicians looking at terrible ideas from America and trying to replicate them.

        This is a pretty good example. America wouldn’t do this, exactly, but it’s a step towards our terrible bike infrastructure. The other poster had the right of it: in America, the sign wouldn’t be there at all, but the intersection would still be badly designed.

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sign or not this is pretty much how cyclists are supposed to cross most big intersections and the inconvenience of it is the reason so many of them break the rules. If you make rules that are too complicated, counterintuitive or inconvenient people will break them.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If I need 5min to read and understand a road sign which you will pass at >15km/h annd have 10sek to read it’s just bad.

    • schnokobaer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s presented the way it is, it’s just shit infrastructure.

      Someone designed this intersection and got asked where the bike paths were and they went “oh, the bikepaths, yeah, they exist… here and here and here… it’s just not on this particular slide, or any other slide I’ve brought today. It’ll totally be there on the final thing.”

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It makes sense if you believe that cars should have absolute priority in traffic and should never never ever be in the slightest inconvenienced in order to make life easier for cyclists.

  • 2000mph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh I get it. The top picture is a bike. 🚲 The bottom picture is the same bike after being hit by a 6ft tall SUV while trying to cross that intersection.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ahh, the classic “we built this six lane monstrosity of a road for cars and have scraps here, here and here for the legally mandated bike lane that people voted for, but we don’t really want to piss the NIMBYs off. Fuck it, just make it as cheap and inconvenient as possible.”

    If the roles were reversed, drivers would be kicking down the door to the mayor, lol.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Man, I hate the detours you’re supposed to take as a pedestrian or bicyclist, so that car drivers don’t get inconvenienced.

  • marius
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Basically bikes have to go around the intersection as if it was a roundabout

    • Frog@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Is it not obvious? You’re not allowed to go straight from the sign is.

      You have to make a right if you want to make a right, a left or continue going straight.

      They probably have the lanes marked out too.