• Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I know so many people who adamantly stand by their use of it. I used to say it, too, but all it took was one person to point out to me that it was hurtful and I apologised and stopped no questions asked. I don’t get why it’s so hard to just have a little empathy.

    • Anvil Lavigne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      i used to think it was okay for me to say as i’m disabled. what i noticed, though, is that my doing so 1) communicated to my abled peers that it’s okay for them to say as well & 2) made me appear as a pick-me; i was perceived as “one of the good ones.”

      the r-slur has been causing a very visceral reaction in me for years & i will continue to report each & every instance of it.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        That’s the problem I have when people of that slur use it. And worse, they act like it’s not a big deal. There’s offensive words I can use because of my skin tone that would absolutely get any non-colored person choked out.

        But you nailed it. If I brush it off like it doesnt offend/isn’t a disgusting word, then I am giving permission to others that it’s okay to say.

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Here’s the way I see it: to most people, that word is not linked to a disability. It’s just a word to describe bewilderment or exasperation at someone, something, some situation. It’s not intended to be hurtful.

      I have a disability as well. I see about twenty percent of what normal people see. I’m pretty much blind without my contacts or glasses. I don’t get offended when someone uses terms like ‘short-sighted’ or when someone says ‘are you blind?’ to someone else. We also use seeing metaphors quite a lot if you pay attention to them. I’m not offended by it, because I know the language is not intended to offend me.

      I’ve also worked with people who had actual mental disabilities. And trust me, most of them know damn well when something’s intended as an insult or when it’s just metaphorical use.

      • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I hope that most people can look past it in the same way but unfortunately intent doesn’t change how hurtful some things can be. And it’s still language that serves to otherise a group of people. Just like the N and F words which have both declined heavily in use (at least since I’ve been alive).

        The way I look at it is that my want to use certain words does not outweigh other people’s feelings. English is full of fun and interesting things to say, we can get a bit more creative than just using slurs.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      based and i adore people who are like you

      it does tend to be a good litmus test for disempathy, sadly. obviously there are outliers, but if one can’t take a tiny correction to like 0.01% of their vocabulary, color me not surprised when that same person starts talking about the immigrant problem or women’s place in the home or something :(

      • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        My guy still thinks bigotry is caused by lack of empathy. It’s actually selective empathy that helps encourage bigots.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Selective presence of empathy is exactly equivalent to selective lack of empathy, which is a type of lack of empathy.