• /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      Arch. Just updated a few days ago, got some java conflict stuff. Jdm jre or some kind of error. Had to read what people online did to fix that.

      Edit: lmao why am I being downvoted?

      • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 days ago

        You’re probably being downvoted because you say “Not Again” to updates while using a rolling release distro. Like ordering a daily newspaper, then getting annoyed at getting a new issue every day.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Just because I use rolling doesn’t mean I am mandated to update every minute of my life. There are times when I’m genuinely excited for an update like for example when KDE does something new. Pretty much everything else is just little tweaks and bug fixes that will most likely result in me reading docs and figuring out what went wrong.

          • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 days ago

            Sure, but the common consensus seems to be that you shouldn’t be annoyed at the constant updates when that’s an explicit feature of that system. Maybe that’s just a misreading, but I assume the expected reaction would be “Not now” rather than “Not again”.

            (I’m not taking a position, as I’ve never worked with a rolling distro and can’t really comment on either stance, just trying to navigate the confusion here)

      • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Well yeah, rolling release distros inherently require more fixing because you get all of the software as it is patched with far less testing for conflicts. If you want something you have to fix less get a stable release

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Which is kinda why I like waiting a little but that doesn’t really matter because it’s always rolling. Guess I’m just delaying having to fix my system. So I update whenever I’m not busy with my life.

          • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Yeah, I’m just saying with Arch the tweaking is a feature, not a bug. You can get the same UI with something far more plug and play using something like Debian Stable or even Mint if you like Cinnamon. I’m an openSUSE stan myself but thats just because I like to experiment, break things, and then roll my system back.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 days ago

        If you want reliable updates Arch isn’t the best fit IMO.

        It can be perfectly reliable for sure, but it’s permitted not to be.

        If you really want to update and not worry about it, I would consider Fedora, they test updates and upgrades while also being very close to bleeding edge.