It’s still not earning you money to spend electricity because you still have to pay the transfer fee which is around 6 cents / kWh but it’s pretty damn cheap nevertheless, mostly because of the excess in wind energy.

Last winter because of a mistake it dropped down to negative 50 cents / kWh for few hours, averaging negative 20 cents for the entire day. People were literally earning money by spending electricity. Some were running electric heaters outside in the middle of the winter.

  • cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Many active reactors rely on old designs, we have new ones now that are far cleaner. Some even use existing waste as fuel, so we would be able to get rid of those old stock piles.

    Ofc the oil industry is fighting that tooth and nail since it doesn’t jive with their FUD campaign

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not only doesn’t it follow their FUD, but their existing business cannot easily transition to it since the entire process is completely different. Oil, coal, and natural gas are all fairly similar from their perspective.

      • cows_are_underrated
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The only thing I’m curious about in terms of using waste as energy source is how much it costs. If we can build reactors that have a good efficiency and don’t cost too much its great. However if it costs way to much it isn’t really useful even if the Idea of reducing our waste is good, since ain’t anyone is paying for it if you can much cheaper renewable energy.

    • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah and because those new designs are so great we see them installed all over the world. Except the projects take decades, skyrocket in costs and get delayed for decades on top.

      Advocating for nuclear power now is in the best interest of the oil lobby. And it is simply impossible to solve the urgent energy transition with it, even if all the miracles promised about it were true.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except the projects take decades, skyrocket in costs and get delayed for decades on top.

        You’re literally spreading oil lobby propaganda, the only reason it’s like that is because of excessive regulation and red tape lobbied for by the oil execs and citizen pushback due to their fear mongering campaign

      • JamesFire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except the projects take decades, skyrocket in costs and get delayed for decades on top.

        France is doing just fine with none of those issues.