• Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    That is not how I pictured it at all. Aren’t the walls supposed to be what’s tallest to protect from the storms?

    • Nighed@sffa.communityOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think so, not sure about the palace, everything there indicates it was perched on the top - should still have had a rock as a wind break though?

      I don’t think they are crazy high in the rest of the city though, just enough to break the worst of the wind?

      • Infynis@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I definitely didn’t think the palace was way up high like this. Not only does it not make sense with the storms, we also know there are stairs up to the Oathgate platform, and they definitely weren’t described as precipitous, or especially long