• De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    His pockets are only in two states each. He may be in physical possession of illegal drugs for that one state, but the drugs themselves may not be there. How would that be ruled?

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Three out of four of those corners (including the one in which the gummies are a misdemeanor) are also within the Navajo Nation. Kinda feels like that tribal jurisdiction ought to matter.

    • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      They do. And for most purposes each reservation is it’s own little defacto nation. They aren’t truly, but definitely in spirit lol.

      • Eyelessoozeguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Each nation has its own agreement with the USA that defines these things, it’s weird. I think it’s in Wisconsin where tribe members retain hunting and fishing rights to a lake sold as a private lake, when cops showed up, they had to let them fish and hunt or the land would be returned to the tribe. As per the agreement from long ago.

  • ickplant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Love me some Four Corners mischief. There is usually a food truck there serving Native American frybread - delicious!!!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Do they sell “Indian tacos?” I had that when I was working at a local TV station shooting news footage of a regional powwow and it was awesome. Taco ingredients on the frybread you’re talking about.

      I’m not meaning to be culturally insensitive. They called them Indian tacos, not me.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Yes, American Indians prefer to be called Indians, not native Americans. You’re not being insensitive.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          In my experience, there seems to be a lot of disagreement on that point, but it is not my ethnicity, so I don’t feel like I’m right to speak on any of their behalves.

        • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 days ago

          I live in a population area with a lot of native Americans, and I’ve literally never heard that before. I only hear a preference toward, “native” or “indigenous”.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            have you ever asked them? My wife works on reservations. They unanimously want to be called Indian. CGP Grey has a video on it as well I’m pretty sure. And I think it’s pretty telling that the agency is called the Bureau of Indian Affairs and not the Bureau of Native American affairs. https://www.usa.gov/agencies/bureau-of-indian-affairs

            We’ve had plenty of reform of sports team names, you’d think they’d want to reform the actual federal agency name if it wasn’t what they wanted it to be called.

            • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              Yeah, I have. I wonder if it’s a difference of reservation versus non-reservation? I don’t really interact with people from the reservations, just people that have moved into the city. Really interesting, I’ll look for that video.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              I generally try to avoid the whole thing and call any people who were there before the colonials came ‘indigenous,’ which applies to the peoples of Australia and Polynesia as it does the Americas.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Habeus Corpus. Any judge would laugh a prosecutor out of the court if this was the only evidence.

      Then they would probably be fired.

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Clouds will form over the spot as a warm wind blows in from the southeast. Flecks of rain will fall and a slow rumble will build from below as the ground shakes and a hole appears from the fallen ground. A representative of each will be sent: a sheriff, an artist, a socially conscious libertarian, and a racist.

      They will each give you one gift and then the sheriff arrests you and takes you to be judged by the racists. The others watch on in quiet disapproval, to the abortion or the arrest it isn’t clear. The racist then says “As foretold, the skies open and you’re on trial in another state.”

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      I think it would be pretty much impossible to prove he had gummies in his pocket at the time. I also don’t know that Stephan Pastis is the right person to make an example of.