• dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I keep basically all of my shit on Gitlab, so depending on who they sell it to, that might be a goodbye. I’ve really enjoyed the platform, but if it goes into hands of either some clueless business people, data aggregator, or “AI-first” bullshit, i’m migrating to something else.

      • lysdexic@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        There would be no other incentive for companies to buy it.

        A company might want to extend it’s service offering with a build pipeline/CICD system, and buying GitLab would get them the best-in-class service.

        Microsoft bought GitHub for much of the same reasons, and GitHub didn’t went to hell after the acquisition.

    • TootSweet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m in the same boat. I migrated all my stuff to Gitlab the day it was announced that Github was being acquired by Microsoft. I hadn’t even really heard of Codeberg at the time. So I migrated to Gitlab.

      And it sounds now like there’s a high likelikhood I’ll need to move it all again.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’ve been casually taking a look at it for a bit, so it’s definitely on the radar

        Edit: Overall i’m happy, at first proper glance, but not having access to even barebones CI is kind of a pain. I can’t really deploy my own at the moment, and having to request access to their own Woodpecker instance is something that seems unlikely to be approved

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Codeberg is where I will be next. A nonprofit ownership created because they didn’t like the commercialization of other providers that’s getting more and more popular. Seems like they likely won’t go down this rabbit hole.

    • mark@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You shouldn’t wait because it’s going to happen. I moved all of my projects off of Github and Gitlab, and now self-hosting my own gitea instance. It’s been great and never looked back!

      • thegreenguy@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Btw gitea has been involved in some shit, most of the Devs quit and created Forgejo. AFAIK you can seamlessly switch from gitea without needing to completely reset it.

      • Laser
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I actually have an account on there with almost nothing, just my nix configuration, plus a repo I cloned to commit a bug fix on software I used. But it seemed like the most responsible solution as in the price is reasonable, plus I actually like the interface. Codeberg also looks good and claims to be better in some regards, but these are the only choices nowadays.

        Anyhow, I’m still waiting for Pijul to have a final 1.0 release and independent hosting solutions to appear.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Same here. Gitlab CI was a game-changer for me, too. Any thoughts on where else you’d consider going? Aside from GitHub, that is.

      • dinckel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I suspect that in the worst case scenario, i’ll be moving stuff to Codeberg and hosting my own CI to support it

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s funny because despite all the fearmongering about Microsoft’s Github acquisition it feels like it only improved since then, while Gitlab has done a shitton of questionable and shitty decisions, a ton of critical security issues and in general feels like (at best) they don’t know what they are doing.

      The only thing Gitlab has going for itself is that it’s self-hostable, but they still retain a large amount of control.