Seemed verbose, overengineered, unnecessary framework introducing complexity. I didn’t see a strong use case for it, maybe for a lack of an obvious one or my understanding of it.

It also didn’t leave a strong impression. I had to look at the site and goal/description to remember.

Maybe some niche data handlers and implementors have use for it. But a Wikimedia project seems overblown for that.

I have not used it though. I’m open to being shown and corrected.

What conclusion did you come to?

He’s gonna live a long life. Until we know pi.

I really like Calendar Versioning CalVer.

Gives so much more meaning to version numbers. Immediately obvious how old, and from when.

Nobody knows when Firefox 97 released. If it were 22.2 you’d know it’s from February 2022.

It doesn’t conflict with semver either. You can use y.M.<release>. (I would prefer using yy.MM. but leading 0 is not semver.)

Where would/should the mapping happen? Probably not the Set constructor. JSON.parseSet()?

JSON.parseSet = json => new Set(JSON.parse(json));
JSON.parseSet('["A", "B", "C", "A", "B"]'); // Set(3) [ "A", "B", "C" ]

/edit: JSON.parseMap()

JSON.parseMap = json => new Map(Object.entries(JSON.parse(json)));
JSON.parseMap('{"a":1,"b": 2}'); // Map { a → 1, b → 2 }

In my Firefox I get a NS_BINDING_ABORTED error on the Google Fonts font request.

And they didn’t specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added monospace as a fallback.

Ignoring secondary email addresses, what was my primary [onlineaccount] E-Mail address has changed four times.

Seems like a valid formalization.

I think a or a few counter-examples would go a long way though.

The “rectangle” probably isn’t supposed to be this messy?

Are you saying “don’t use a synthetic key, you ain’t gonna need it”?

People regularly change email addresses. Listing that as an example is a particularly bad example in my opinion.

Webcrawlers count as users too, right?

Turned into a skeleton in 10 minutes

The site name’s a play on “The Onion” so it’s gotta be satire, right? I couldn’t find an about page to confirm.

Yes, it’s satire.

The page is run by one author https://www.theolognion.com/about and no description or goal described

Runs on “substack” platform (standard software)

The story reads like a story, and the mentioned company does not exist