A woman claimed music exec “sexually abused, forcibly touched, and subjected [her] to sexual harassment and retaliation.” Iovine says that “no one has ever made a claim like this”

    • Salamendacious@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair the full quote is:

      “No one has ever made a claim like this against Jimmy Iovine, nor have we been contacted or made aware of any complaint by anyone, including this unknown plaintiff prior to now.”

      Also the complainant filled anonymously, which is her right, and “the legal filing contained little additional information regarding the woman’s specific claims.” So there isn’t much he could specifically respond to. There will most certainly be at least a civil suit and I’m sure more details will emerge then.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The full quote doesn’t make it any better IMO. The context you provide does provide some explanation, but an explanation to a response he didn’t give.

        If he had said something along the lines of “I have received this complaint and while there are not enough details to specifically respond I look forward to defending myself in court” that would have been another matter entirely.

        The response he actually gave just sounds suspicious. There’s not enough to claim any knowledge of wrongdoing but it also doesn’t give off an air of confidence in his innocence.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Why? I haven’t reached any conclusions either way because I haven’t heard the facts yet. I have an open mind towards all possibilities. Isn’t that what you would be looking for on a jury?

            • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              In your original post you called it a

              suspicious defence.

              To me (and seemingly to others) it is weird that you interpret anything at all in this blanket response by some spokesperson.

              I know nothing about this Iovine guy.
              If he did it he should be punished, if he didn’t he should be exonerated.
              But this spokespersons PR statement doesn’t make him any more or less suspicious to me and I find it kind of weird that it would for anyone.

              Btw I am not one of the people that downvoted you, I’m just trying to clear up possible confusion.