Jakylla@sh.itjust.worksM to Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoSimple to say but hard to solvesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageSimple to say but hard to solvesh.itjust.worksJakylla@sh.itjust.worksM to Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square3fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarejbrains@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 year agoIt’s merely a slightly longer sum, so what’s the problem?
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI get the feeling you haven’t solved many.
minus-squareMagnetar@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoI mean they’re right, Leibniz used a modified s for summa, sum. And an integral is just a sum, an infinite sum over infinitesimal summands, but a sum nevertheless.
It’s merely a slightly longer sum, so what’s the problem?
I get the feeling you haven’t solved many.
I mean they’re right, Leibniz used a modified s for summa, sum. And an integral is just a sum, an infinite sum over infinitesimal summands, but a sum nevertheless.