Potentialy dumb question here, is there any benefit to using btrfs on a non system disk? I’m fairly ignorant on file systems, asfaik btrfs largest benefit is snapshotting, not sure of anyothers.

  • Granixo@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I usually just stick to the standard file system to any OS.

    So for Linux that would be ext4.

    For external drives i use either FAT32 (the ol’ reliable) or exFAT (the fastest for dealing with large files when you set the max allocation unit size AKA 32MB).

    • falcon15500@lemmy.nine-hells.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So for Linux that would be ext4.

      It’s worth noting that the default file system varies by distro - there is no ‘Linux’ default. For example, RHEL et al use XFS as the default.

        • Ananace@lemmy.ananace.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          RHEL is going hard on XFS, they’ve even completely removed BTRFS support from their kernel - they don’t have any in-house development competency in it after all. It’s somewhat understandable in that regard, since otherwise they wouldn’t necessarily be able to offer filesystem-level support to their paying customers.

          Though it is a little bit amusing, seeing as Fedora - the RHEL upstream - uses BTRFS as their default filesystem.