• zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Infrastructure delivers more economic impact with less grifting when it’s not designed and run to make a profit on its own.

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Right? When did we start becoming concerned with a public service being “profitable”? I’ve heard this applied to the US Postal Service a lot recently.

      • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I first remember it becoming an issue when a failed businessman turned president wanted to run the country like one of his failed businesses.

        • Zitronensaft@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I remember Postal Service profitability being a political issue under the second Bush, too. Trump didn’t start that. He probably even benefited from the previous rounds because he bought a historic post office in DC when it was sold off and he turned it into a hotel. That’s the same hotel where people stayed during his presidency to curry favor with him.

      • geissi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        When did we start becoming concerned with a public service being “profitable”?

        Late 80s, early 90s, with the rise of the rise of the Chicago School of neoliberalism.