• Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    15 years ago I thought the Germans were the smartest people in the world because they understood the importance of investing in public services and had a central european style of capitalism that focused on fundamentals over financialization. since then they’ve slowly been adopting more neoliberal policies and making really stupid foreign policy decisions. I’ve lost a lot of respect for them as a world leader.

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m German and have been in France quite often in recent years. It’s fascinating to hear their opinions on Germany. Outside our country is still imaged as having great engineering, efficiency - that Trains run on time. It’s quite puzzling to me.

      I came to the conclusion that the only real innovation in the last 30 years has been accounting. largely driven by neoliberalism. So every neo liberal country has kind of become more similar. Germany is not special, but has the advantage of having a lot of old successful companies that only slowly get sold of to international conglomerates. (Like Kuka etc). We behave as shitty as the rest, but our downward trajectory started higher up.

      Modern computers and software made it possible to account for basically every item in a company with little cost. Before you’d have needed so many people and hours of work to judge profitability of small things that it wouldn’t have been sensible to do so. CAD-Software also enables a special kind of accounting - simulating hardware components enables engineers to judge which parts are necessary and how much thickness is really needed. This is a huge and complicated process of optimization.

      Accounting made it possible to turn a mostly opaque company structure that ran inefficient (but mostly on par with the competition) and judge every employee, every item. That’s why supermarkets have outsourced the job of restuffing the shelves to a different company (that has to somehow make it work with the shitty pay that get). But it’s also the reason why appliances seem to hold just slightly over the warranty period. CAD-simulations made it possible for the accountants to change the products (make them shittier) so that people would need to buy new ones often.

      The Deutsche Bahn is the same. Has made it possible to invest the smallest amount possible, because they realized they can just work with the deterioration infrastructure as well - most people don’t have a choice and have to take the late train anyways.

      It’s the same with telecommunications here btw. With only few companys owning most Internet services they realized they don’t have to invest a lot into fiber. People need Internet and will have to pay anyways. It’s more profit to just raise prices.

      • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting point of view - your accounting thing.

        However, that doesn’t really fit to Deutsche Bahn, I think. Your point is rather about a Monopoly but an accounting exercise.

        • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it was not specifically only about Deutsche Bahn, but also an observation about one of the multiple problems that drives the enshittification.

          One Point that Deutsche Bahn definitely did was to find out which connections are mostly used by people ( tickets for these connections thereby contribute mostly to DBs revenue) and kind of abandon the less profitable connections. That’s accounting in my book.

          What they did (counting passangers by rail-connections) wasn’t possible before, as DB-tickets were sold not electronically and couldn’t easily (cheaply / with little work-hours) be turned into data sets and analyzed.

          IIRC tickets were priced much differently - they weren’t fixed to specific trains but to connections (no “Zugbindung”). So There wasn’t even (easily available) data to when most travellers were using the trains.

          Today with all the data being generates automatically the accountains know much better what costs and what earns DB money and they prioritize based on that. Once you get into the habit of that even things that are obviously always costs (like fixing rails or bridges) will be outsourced or avoided. (like the supermarket example - it’s obvious that someone has to restuff the shelves, but once you have all the data and see only red numbers you try to separate it away and not do it (so it gets turned into a subcontract with probably unrealistic conditions that some other companies are underbidding each other in order to gain the contract - even if this means that their employees will not earn a living wage from it. It’s a perfect system that also pushes responsibility and blame away from the outsourcing company. they can always blame the sub contracting company for underpaying or not follow safety regulations (even if they can only fulfill the sub contract by operating this way)).

          • DrunkenPirate@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            True. Accounting is the best friend of digitization.

            However, it’s not always bad to look what makes sense or drive profit and what not. It’s rather a matter of how religious one is about it.

            Take the second wave of computerism for example. What we call Digitalization. This is mainly driven by opportunities and chances of new business not so much about squeezing out the last percent of profit. This all is accounted as well, but management doesn’t care.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh no, that actually started way earlier!

      The DB was supposed to be privatized in 1994, that failed. So now we have a stock based company (AG), lead like a profit oriented company, but owned 100% by the state.

      Since 1994, the entire company was (due to incompentence and wrong incentives) driven on attrition. The best example: if a bridge needs repair, that’s DB’s expense, but if the bridge has to be rebuilt, the state pays. So what would any smart CEO do? Stop maintenance, wait for the bridge to fail and then have it repaired on the state’s bill.

  • Esqplorer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an American who used DB for the first time, their shitty transit blows the best travel experiences here out of the water. I’d rather use German trains than fly first class in the US. Not even close TBH.

    • Johanno@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Understandable. How about you travel by foot instead. At least it is easier to understand than the ticket system of DB

    • JoYo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i donno, amtrak is pretty great on the east coast. there’s absolutely nothing from the mississippi to the west coast so if you’re going that way youre going to have a bad time.

          • ALavaPulsar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Frequent delays. Poor frequency. Weird routes. Slow average speeds that can barely compete with a bus. Always getting bogged down by track-sharing with freight.

            The Northeast corridor is the only section of the entire system that is even remotely decent and is basically subsidizing the crappy lines that they are congressionally mandated to run so it’s not even that cost competitive with other modes.

            To be fair, most of this isn’t Amtrak’s fault but just a reflection of the fact that America doesn’t care about passenger rail.

            • Zitronensaft@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              My cousin visited Texas from Germany and took a train from Dallas to Austin. The track sharing with freight was insane, the trip took 9 hours due to freight having right-of-way on the tracks. It’s only about a 3.5 hour drive. He was not impressed at all.

  • zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Infrastructure delivers more economic impact with less grifting when it’s not designed and run to make a profit on its own.

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? When did we start becoming concerned with a public service being “profitable”? I’ve heard this applied to the US Postal Service a lot recently.

      • geissi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        When did we start becoming concerned with a public service being “profitable”?

        Late 80s, early 90s, with the rise of the rise of the Chicago School of neoliberalism.

      • winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I first remember it becoming an issue when a failed businessman turned president wanted to run the country like one of his failed businesses.

        • Zitronensaft@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I remember Postal Service profitability being a political issue under the second Bush, too. Trump didn’t start that. He probably even benefited from the previous rounds because he bought a historic post office in DC when it was sold off and he turned it into a hotel. That’s the same hotel where people stayed during his presidency to curry favor with him.

  • Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “A nation built on efficiency”. These times are looong over. We had a good run with our Wirtschaftswunder in post-WWII times and that’s about it.

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Wirtschaftswunder also had a lot to do with the Social Market Economy which, along with our train network, has been crippled by decades of neoliberal reforms.