• keropoktasen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Okay, so how can you relate that definition with what both sides are doing? I mean from a non-bias perspective.

      • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        clearly, we should boycott, ~~de-invest ~~ Divestment and sanction israel. just like we do with hamas and the pa.

          • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            everyday, in fact international security agencies should do more to help. in fact greater israel should be a international nation new home of the united nations. the us should invade to establish a cease fire until this is established. it is the only way to stop the blood shed. from both sides. after all israeli settlers can’t be left without protection until the law is the same for all greater israel citizens.

              • porcariasagrada@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                that is why i said invaded by the united states and not the un. i think us can guarantee israeli safety. but immediate sacrifices must be made, like having to move house for a while, until the peace process is finished. it could work. it would solve a lot of problems. but i know this is pure unfiltered hopism.

                edit: we’ll do like this. the us takes control of israel, the un control of gaza and the west bank. settlers would be under united states protection until the peace process is finished.

                • keropoktasen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Israel is not a threat to palestine if hamas or any other palestinian stop threatening the israeli. They did accepted the UN plan to coexist side by side at first, something the arab world rejected by jointly attacking israel. Now they’re begging to revert to the original plan after israel emerged victorious over them. It is not for us as outsiders to decide, but for among them to find a solution.

                  • Prunebutt@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Guess israel shouldn’t have funded Hamas, then to divide and control palestine, then, huh?