For me it’s quantum computing - especially considering its impact on most current encryption methods

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not going to happen I don’t think not while hardware is cheaper than development costs

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I disagree. But these improvements are often low level, so that Meta can save costs doing the shit they do

        • flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          All well and good but at the higher end they’re writing applications in JavaScript and electron and using many times more system resources than C or rust, and it will always be cheaper for them to develop in higher level languages (especially when the performance problem can be offloaded on the user’s machine instead of their own servers)

            • flashgnash@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not laziness it’s economics.

              It’s cheaper for companies to have their developers spend less time developing in higher level languages and just throw more hardware at the problem than spend more money developing in a more difficult language

              They aren’t concerned with energy or material efficiency, only financial

              • Pantherina@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Only their own specifically. Our economy wants people to only care about themselves. Even though this doesnt make sense as polluting the earth will directly impact you.

    • AgentRocket@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s a massive fusion reactor in the sky that we could easily use by turning the radiation from it into electricity or harnessing the winds that are caused by the temperature differences it creates.

      Nuclear fusion still has a long way to go, but to slow climate change (already too late to stop it) we need to act now.

  • theFibonacciEffect@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Differentiable programming. Differentiable ray tracers for example can be used to reconstruct the geometry of something you took a picture off.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reusable rocketry, specifically SpaceX Starship. If it pans out it’s going to completely change our access to space and make many of those old dreams from the 1970s plausible.

    RNA vaccines for basically everything, including customized vaccines for cancer. There’s also actual progress happening in general cures for autoimmune diseases.

    Is robotics too close to AI? There are multiple companies working on general-purpose humanoid robots intended for mass production with price targets in the ten to twenty thousand dollar range, we may be getting within sight of actual robot butlers.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I just hope we use Starships capabilities to put less single use hardware in Orbit. The way it is build already releases less space junk for delivering payloads, but these payloads need to be build with servicing in mind. Even building them to burn up should not be the solution