Dog meat consumption, a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula, isn’t explicitly prohibited or legalized in South Korea

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dog meat consumption is a centuries-old practice on the Korean Peninsula and has long been viewed as a source of stamina on hot summer days. It’s neither explicitly banned nor legalized in South Korea, but more and more people want it prohibited. There’s increasing public awareness of animal rights and worries about South Korea’s international image.

    • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I haven’t met anyone below sixty who eats dog meat. Even if it doesn’t get banned, I’m sure the practice will die out within one generation. It’s definitely getting rarer and rarer.

      It’s sad that a fringe, outdated practice reflects poorly on the whole country. Most Koreans love dogs and they’re as horrified by the practice as Westerners are.

      • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t get what’s so horrifying about eating dogs that wouldn’t be just as horrifying when applied to other animals. Why can’t we love other animals just as much as we love dogs?

        • FlowVoid@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Should we love mesofauna and other invertebrates as much too? Because plenty of those are killed in the process of growing vegan food.

          • Vegoon@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Feeding animals plants is responsible for 3/4 of the agricultural land. The goal of veganism is to reduce suffering as much as possible. There is no illusion of living on earth with zero impact, the goal is a minimize the impact. We could reduce the land use to 1/4 with a plant based diet. And obviously stop the intentional killing and abusing of sentient beings.

            • FlowVoid@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Then don’t eat animals you have to feed. If you really want to reduce animal suffering as much as possible, then you should try to survive via hunting and fishing as much as possible.

              In fact, if you consider that a wild-caught fish was likely about to kill other fish, then catching a fish may be as morally necessary as flipping a switch on a runaway trolley.

              • Vegoon@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why is it that you insist on killing others? My plant based diet is cheaper, healthier and creates less suffering. Do you think everyone could or should just kill wild animals when they don’t need to? https://xkcd.com/1338/

                a wild-caught fish was likely about to kill other fish, then catching a fish may be as morally necessary

                The fish has no alternative and if you catch one you steal it without the need for it from other animals. Are you trying to make lions vegans? We have options, we have moral agency.

                • FlowVoid@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Killing animals is inevitable regardless of diet. Your plant based diet requires growing crops, but tilling soil and harvesting plants kills millions or billions of invertebrates. They are so small that they escape everyone’s attention, yet they are still animals killed to make your food.

                  Fishing and hunting kills animals too, of course. But it does not require literally uprooting an ecosystem.

                  Finally, a trolley has no moral agency either. That doesn’t mean nobody should interfere with it, or even destroy it if it threatens enough other lives.

                  • Vegoon@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Killing animals is inevitable regardless of diet. Your plant based diet requires growing crops, but tilling soil and harvesting plants kills millions or billions of invertebrates. They are so small that they escape everyone’s attention, yet they are still animals killed to make your food.

                    Are you a concern troll or do just don’t know that we could reduce with a plant based diet the land use, the tiling of soil and the killing of those billions invertebrates? The intentional killing of 90 billion land animals and trillions of fish aside