• federalreverse-old@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    might

    For the moment, that is the important bit. All the tooling is expensive medical stuff right now (they’re even owned by a medical company) and afaik there’s also the question of how to produce a cheap, sustainable nutrient solution. Let’s see whether this takes off now or whether we’re a couple decades early.

    • Sigmatics@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      cheap, sustainable nutrient solution

      which kinda brings up the next point, does this type of meat have the same nutrition properties? There aren’t any studies on that yet afaik

      • federalreverse-old@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If they use similar input to regular feed, they should have similar output. Except it’s just the meat and no bones, brains, or other animal parts that modern humans find largely inedible. However, most companies started out by using animal products as the nutrient solution (e.g. some kind of fetal serum for beef products) which meant killing animals nonetheless. Multiple companies say they have solved the issue but at the same time go around saying “proprietary! proprietary!”, so we don’t really know whether it’s just smoke and mirrors for their investors.