• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this supposed to be a cocky joke? I can’t tell. What metric of “most popular” is the author usiing?

    Number of active users.

    • 20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      those numbers are nonexistent for most distribution, since forcing telemetry isn’t really a cool move in the free software world

          • Turun@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Any company invested enough to host a local mirror will not give a blank install of Ubuntu to their employees though.

            You can argue that other distros are popular as well, but when it comes to the “I’ve heard of this Linux thing, let’s try it out” crowd Ubuntu is the goto option, no doubt about it. And the impact on this crowd is exactly what is discussed in the article.

            • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Hundreds of thousands of people using eg. Debian plus a software profile plus a sources.list file with an intranet address don’t count as using Debian?
              I’m not arguing about the contents of the article, I’m discussing specifically the relevance of generating usage statistics based on IP hits and ISO downloads.

              • Turun@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                For the purpose of the article: no they don’t.

                If you want to discuss telemetry or how to measure popularity of Linux Distros, please submit and link me an appropriate post, I’ll be happy to discuss it there. But it simply adds nothing to the discussion here.