Not sure why this got removed from 196lemmy…blahaj.zone but it would be real nice if moderation on Lemmy gave you some sort of notification of what you did wrong. Like an automatic DM or something

  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would say we can’t in most cases know exactly or even approximately what is the objectively morally better decision. But that doesn’t make it less objective. It just makes it hard or perhaps even impossible to know.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because for something to be considered objective the only necessary condition is that how something is lies entirely with the object itself and not with the person(s) looking at it. Whether or not we can measure it in actuality doesn’t matter for that definition.

        Consider you could wire every existing person up to some kind of device that measures their physical and psychological pain and gives out a number, it doesn’t matter who looks at it, it would obviously always be the same number.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You think everyone has the same levels of physical and psychological pain tolerance? Nonsense. I have trigeminal neuralgia. I’m would bet my pain tolerance is objectively a hell of a lot higher than yours at this point.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I thought the device was a way to measure objective truths. How could they be objective if our numbers are different for the same type of pain generation?

              • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because the question isn’t whether or not each action causes the same pain in everyone, but whether or not it is theoretically measurable and comparable.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How do you measure it accurately if it isn’t the same for everyone? How is this number calculated when pain is subjective? Because pain is not objective. Some people even enjoy pain.

                  • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Obviously someone who enjoys pain or feels it less suffers less from the same action.

                    If you like listening to Baby Shark and I don’t, listening to Baby Shark is a fun experience for you, but not for me. That the song can be liked in different amounts is an objective reality.