• Konlanx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been adblocking on YouTube for as long as I remember. Personally I think it’s unusable without an adblocker. What’s the alternative? Because I am not suddenly going to pay for a platform that keeps getting worse all the time.

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      When ever I see someone using YouTube without an adblocker it looks like some cheap chinese knock-off or something. As someone who sees less ads than 99% of people I’ve genuinely became a bit oversensitive to them. Podcasts are the only thing I keep paying attention to despite them having ads which even then I always skip over. Other than that every online platform I use is ad-free and I don’t watch TV or listen to radio either.

      • Konlanx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like to listen to podcasts in the gym and I will interrupt my set to skip sponsors and ads. The enshittification on Spotify is particularly bad as they now play ads in addition to sponsorings for premium listeners.

        • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I don’t personally use spotify for podcasts even though I have premium aswell. Except for the occasional JRE episode I listen everything else on Podcast Republic.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as we have the physical capability of pointing a camera at a display, people will control what they see. Worst case scenario in these browser wars, you run Chrome on a Google certified device then stream the output of that device to the computer you’re actually using, using various filters and vision recognition removing the advertisement from your video stream.

    This is extreme, it’s a little crazy, but I think everyone can agree it’s technically feasible. This means we will always have the edge in the browser wars. If we control the display, we control the flow.

    Everything else is just an optimization

    • penguin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s fundamentally impossible to grant read access without copy. And you can always do whatever you want to your copy.

      Otherwise, piracy wouldn’t be a thing.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Im skipping a few steps. Down then road when they have WEI or something like it, they will only show videos in a secure environment… i.e. where the entire hardware chain has key attestation it hasn’t been modified. In that dark future, we can still do everything through optics.

        I agree with you, if they send you data, no matter how its wrapped, its your data to do with as you wish.

        • elvith@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Even then… I have a small USB stick that has a HDMI port and support HDCP. Which means it will capture any HDMI output unencrypted. It was like… 20 bucks on Ali Express. Since it counts as a valid HDCP sink, WEI can only attest that all components up to the “monitor” support copy protection. But it can’t see or attest, that I can just capture the data unencrypted anyways.

  • Charliebeans@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems like it’s controlled test in different countries and segments. I (Europe) get this popup in Firefox, I also use pi-hole DNS and ublock origin.