野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoIntel rulelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square23linkfedilinkarrow-up1217arrow-down19
arrow-up1208arrow-down1imageIntel rulelemmy.dbzer0.com野麦さん@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square23linkfedilink
minus-squareresipsaloquitur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-21 month agoI’m all for open ISAs, but one of these can be licensed at reasonable rates and the other sued AMD for making the 64-but instruction set architecture that Intel should have made.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agohelp who’s who? there’s three mamufacturers in the meme and I’m woefully uninformed
minus-squareresipsaloquitur@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 month agoArm licenses ISAs and designs. It doesn’t manufacture anything.
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agosorry, right. I still don’t know who sued AMD, I assume intel?
minus-squareDraconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoIt was Intel. Stagnating CPU monopoly they are.
I’m all for open ISAs, but one of these can be licensed at reasonable rates and the other sued AMD for making the 64-but instruction set architecture that Intel should have made.
help who’s who? there’s three mamufacturers in the meme and I’m woefully uninformed
Arm licenses ISAs and designs. It doesn’t manufacture anything.
sorry, right. I still don’t know who sued AMD, I assume intel?
It was Intel. Stagnating CPU monopoly they are.